<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: what has meaning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darmfield.com/2009/what-has-meaning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darmfield.com/2009/what-has-meaning/</link>
	<description>doctoral candidate in rhetoric and scientific and technical communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine Markides</title>
		<link>http://darmfield.com/2009/what-has-meaning/#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine Markides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darmfield.com/?p=2154#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>If you get a chance, take a look at DFW&#039;s &quot;Federer as Religious Experience.&quot; Even if you&#039;re not a tennis fan, and even if you find him a bit circuitous, I think you&#039;ll appreciate this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you get a chance, take a look at DFW&#8217;s &#8220;Federer as Religious Experience.&#8221; Even if you&#8217;re not a tennis fan, and even if you find him a bit circuitous, I think you&#8217;ll appreciate this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley</title>
		<link>http://darmfield.com/2009/what-has-meaning/#comment-3768</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darmfield.com/?p=2154#comment-3768</guid>
		<description>i think DFW had a difficult time following his own advice, as he&#039;s not around anymore.

&quot;an audience that didn&#039;t include me in the first place.&quot;  Toni Morrison is not my favorite author, but i believe it was she who said something along with &quot;you write the things you want to read.&quot; -- the implication that the things she wanted to read had not been there.

i talk about the &quot;dead white men&quot; -- and call them that -- in my lit classes. i explain why i don&#039;t like teaching them, and avoid it as much as possible.

i truly never expected to see a lit class&#039;s (and at the place i&#039;m teaching, no less) eyes literally light up and get into urban fairytale stuff discussing China Mieville and King Rat.  they love it, for the most part, which consistently amazes me -- but i guess it shouldn&#039;t, because i do, too.

i think the kind of thing you&#039;re saying here is exactly what makes you as good a teacher and researcher as you are.  you refuse to color in everyone else&#039;s lines, just because it&#039;s what they think should happen.

you&#039;re creating your own lines with what you&#039;re doing, and in the end, i think that&#039;s what true intellectuals do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think DFW had a difficult time following his own advice, as he&#8217;s not around anymore.</p>
<p>&#8220;an audience that didn&#8217;t include me in the first place.&#8221;  Toni Morrison is not my favorite author, but i believe it was she who said something along with &#8220;you write the things you want to read.&#8221; &#8212; the implication that the things she wanted to read had not been there.</p>
<p>i talk about the &#8220;dead white men&#8221; &#8212; and call them that &#8212; in my lit classes. i explain why i don&#8217;t like teaching them, and avoid it as much as possible.</p>
<p>i truly never expected to see a lit class&#8217;s (and at the place i&#8217;m teaching, no less) eyes literally light up and get into urban fairytale stuff discussing China Mieville and King Rat.  they love it, for the most part, which consistently amazes me &#8212; but i guess it shouldn&#8217;t, because i do, too.</p>
<p>i think the kind of thing you&#8217;re saying here is exactly what makes you as good a teacher and researcher as you are.  you refuse to color in everyone else&#8217;s lines, just because it&#8217;s what they think should happen.</p>
<p>you&#8217;re creating your own lines with what you&#8217;re doing, and in the end, i think that&#8217;s what true intellectuals do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Hare</title>
		<link>http://darmfield.com/2009/what-has-meaning/#comment-3767</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Hare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darmfield.com/?p=2154#comment-3767</guid>
		<description>If you have a point to make, and can make it with great clarity, I will be happy to quote you ahead of people who are presumed to be intelligent but waste it by reffing back on themselves constantly.

&quot;I trust my own instincts more than I do people who write to an audience that didn’t include me in the first place.&quot; is a line far more insightful than the quote you opened with.  It&#039;s good.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a point to make, and can make it with great clarity, I will be happy to quote you ahead of people who are presumed to be intelligent but waste it by reffing back on themselves constantly.</p>
<p>&#8220;I trust my own instincts more than I do people who write to an audience that didn’t include me in the first place.&#8221; is a line far more insightful than the quote you opened with.  It&#8217;s good.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

